Re: [2.6] smbfs & "du" illness

[Jeremy Allison]

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Because right now the number is meaningless, and the Linux client is 
> apparently better off ignoring it totally.

Actually, just to be clear - the number isn't completely
meaningless, it's the actual size on disk (from the st_blocks
if they're available, filesize if not) rounded up to the nearest
1mb boundary. Just didn't want you to think we were randomly
returning 1mb. It's a meaningful number, it's just the granularity
that's a bit off :-).

Jeremy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/