Re: i386 very early memory detection cleanup patch breaks the build

[James Bottomley]

On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 16:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Could you perhaps describe which architecture this is a problem on, and 
> what its entry condition looks like?

This is the Voyager architecture (mach-voyager)

> I removed it because I removed the VISWS dependency, thus making it 
> redundant.  What you seem to be saying is that the dependency should 
> have been on SMP not X86_SMP; if that's the issue then please make it so.
> 
> I think you just needed to apply your own rule to the above statement.

If you mean the dependency should be

	depends X86_SMP || (VOYAGER && SMP)

Then yes, I'm happy with that.

I'm still debugging the boot time failure.  As far as I can tell it
looks like ioremap is failing (this is after paging_init); does this
trigger any associations?

James


James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/