Re: 2.7 thoughts

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2003-10-10T08:30:03,
   Kevin Corry <kevcorry@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

> On Friday 10 October 2003 01:19, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > 	- Software RAID 0+1 perhaps?

Because RAID 0+1 is a rather bad idea. You want RAID 1+0. Make up the
fault matrix and simulate what happens if drives fail.

We can do both though, as Kevin pointed out. So if you want to shot
yourself in the foot, in the best Unix tradition, we allow you to ;)

I'd suggest moving this to the linux-raid list though.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering		ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SuSE Labs				try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG		-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/