Re: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc.

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 10:01:37 EST


On Mon, 29 September 2003 16:50:57 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:36:24PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > First version of the script. Seems to work, but it catches a lot,
> > maybe too much.
>
> What about adding a negative list, so headerfiles that we decide
> shall not be able to compile stand-alone are filtered away.
> But new headers are added.

Would work. But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header
files, under some syntax.

/* attr: indirect header */

Is this acceptable?

Jörn

--
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/