Re: [PATCH] check headers for complete includes, etc.

[Dominik Kubla]

Am Montag, 29. September 2003 17:00 schrieb Jörn Engel:
>
> Would work.  But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header
> files, under some syntax.
>
> /* attr: indirect header */
>
> Is this acceptable?

Just a suggestion: Make it a define. Comments tend to be re-formatted, 
"improved", deleted, etc. You get the picture. So I think that:

#define PRAGMA_INDIRECT_HEADER	TRUE

(or something similiar) would be better suited.

Regards,
  Dominik
-- 
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.    (Francois Marie Arouet aka Voltaire, 1694-1778)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/