Pavel Machek wrote:
>>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I
>>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on
>>seems like it needs polishing yet! :)
>
>
> Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM.
USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they
won't notice missing features there. Regressions
are a different story though.
But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?)
might want to veto suspending devices that are being
used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:49 EST