Hi!
> >>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I
> >>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on
> >>seems like it needs polishing yet! :)
> >
> >
> >Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM.
>
> USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they
> won't notice missing features there. Regressions
> are a different story though.
>
> But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?)
> might want to veto suspending devices that are being
> used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist.
For what kind of I/O? I do not see a reason for disk to veto
suspend. CD-burner might want to do that, but it still would be bad
idea... (Running on battery, battery goes low, and you destroy your CD
*and* your filesystem.
Pavel
-- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:49 EST