Pavel Machek wrote:
>>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they
>>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For
>>example, on suspend:
>>
>> ...
>
> Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems
> like a bug to me.
Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined
more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using
both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here).
Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new"
infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only
register to the old one? I'd rather see those drivers (about
a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call
them the bug...
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:49 EST