Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59

From: Chris Wright (
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 06:08:32 EST

* Christoph Hellwig ( wrote:
> And that for examples is a very important and needed change. Security
> modules as loadable modules are a bad idea as you don't have a consistand
> labelling state - just look at the older selinux versions with all the
> precondition mess. But it should be generalized to a new initcall level
> instead of the current explicit call to the selinux routine..

I wrote such a patch last summer. I'll rebase it to current and post it
(most likely when i return from .se). It needs to be separte from
normal initcalls since they all happen too late.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:46 EST