Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 17:19:04 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [BK SUMMARY] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)"
In reply to: Matt Reppert: "poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Next in thread: Matt Reppert: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Reply: Matt Reppert: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Matt Reppert wrote:
>
> So my guess is somewhere between -mm5 and -mm6 we
> screwed up the atomicity count.

Mine too. I'll check it out, thanks.

Do you have preemption enabled?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.20-rc1 and i810_audio"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [BK SUMMARY] fix NGROUPS hard limit (resend)"
In reply to: Matt Reppert: "poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Next in thread: Matt Reppert: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Reply: Matt Reppert: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:45 EST