Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6

From: Matt Reppert (arashi@arashi.yi.org)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 18:55:31 EST

Next message: Brian Gerst: "[PATCH] make x86 ptrace use init_fpu()"
Previous message: Orion Poplawski: "Running linux-2.4.20-rc1 on Dell Dimension 4550"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:19:04 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> wrote:

> Matt Reppert wrote:
> >
> > So my guess is somewhere between -mm5 and -mm6 we
> > screwed up the atomicity count.
>
> Mine too. I'll check it out, thanks.
>
> Do you have preemption enabled?

Sure do.

Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brian Gerst: "[PATCH] make x86 ptrace use init_fpu()"
Previous message: Orion Poplawski: "Running linux-2.4.20-rc1 on Dell Dimension 4550"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:45 EST