Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 12:03:49 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [RFC] Change locking in block_dev.c:do_open()"
Previous message: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
In reply to: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Next in thread: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Reply: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

brad@ltc.com said:
> 128 Mbit Intel StrataFlash.

Oh - I thought those started returning status bits from all addresses when
ever you were writing or erasing any part of them?

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [RFC] Change locking in block_dev.c:do_open()"
Previous message: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
In reply to: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Next in thread: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Reply: Bradley D. LaRonde: "Re: Mounting a in-ROM filesystem efficiently"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:28 EST