Looks like this patch did the trick guys!
Thanks!
(patch was applied to 2.4.17-pre8)
-Jonathan Stanford
Alan Cox wrote:
>>this problem appears on everything from 2.4.7 (RH7.2 kern) to the
>>latest and greatest (2.4.17-pre8) and probably earlier kernels as well....
>>
>>the southbridge/usb controler is the VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686b chip as you can see in
>>
>
>Seems to be a lot of stuff where the pci routing and Linux isnt getting on
>when it comes to VIA and USB. Dunno if its wrong BIOS tables but the
>following previous patch might help you
>
>Let Manfred and co know if it does
>
>Alan
>
>
>>From manfred@colorfullife.com Sun Nov 04 22:07:34 2001
>To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>CC: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com
>Subject: pci-irq.c
>Status: RO
>
>Hi Alan,
>
>attached is my cleanup of pci-irq.c.
>It works with all my mobos (piix, ali, via) and should fix the vaio
>problem.
>
>The main change is a code cleanup (do not scan first for a good irq,
>and then discard the result and use what's currently installed in
>the irq router, etc) and documentation.
>
>Actual changes:
>* if r->set exists, then always write our idea of the irq number
>into the irq router, even if we use the bios supplied dev->irq number.
>* ignore 'dev2->irq' mismatches - if they exist (e.g. Toms vaio),
>then we must solve them by either using 'dev->irq' or 'dev2->irq'.
>Just looking away means that one device won't work.
>* bounds checking in pirq_via_set. I think I saw pirq=0x58 with my
>ali board, I must check the docu if that can be right.
>
>But I doubt that this solves your via sound problems.
>via sound interrupts are handled with special code in via_quirks,
>and that code is not pirq compatible. Do you have lspci -vxx /
>dump_pirq output?
>
>--
> Manfred
>
>
>--- 2.4/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c Sat Nov 3 19:51:08 2001
>+++ build-2.4/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c Sun Nov 4 22:47:22 2001
>@@ -197,13 +197,24 @@
> */
> static int pirq_via_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq)
> {
>- return read_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq);
>+ /* the internal devices (APCI, MC97, AC97, USB port 1 and 2
>+ * are handled by quirk_via_acpi and quirk_via_irqpic
>+ */
>+ if (pirq < 6)
>+ return read_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq);
>+ return 0;
> }
>
> static int pirq_via_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, int irq)
> {
>- write_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq, irq);
>- return 1;
>+ /* the internal devices (APCI, MC97, AC97, USB port 1 and 2
>+ * are handled by quirk_via_acpi and quirk_via_irqpic
>+ */
>+ if (pirq < 6) {
>+ write_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq, irq);
>+ return 1;
>+ }
>+ return 0;
> }
>
> /*
>@@ -536,8 +547,8 @@
> {
> u8 pin;
> struct irq_info *info;
>- int i, pirq, newirq;
>- int irq = 0;
>+ int i, pirq;
>+ int irq;
> u32 mask;
> struct irq_router *r = pirq_router;
> struct pci_dev *dev2;
>@@ -570,48 +581,65 @@
> mask &= pcibios_irq_mask;
>
> /*
>- * Find the best IRQ to assign: use the one
>- * reported by the device if possible.
>+ * Find the best IRQ to assign:
>+ * 1) hardcoded into pirq 0xf?
>+ * 2) dev->irq.
>+ * There are 2 sources for dev->irq:
>+ * a) stored by the bios into PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE
>+ * b) multiple devices share one pirq, then the loop
>+ * at the end of this function writes to dev->irq
>+ * 3) stored by the bios into the irq router
>+ * 4) only if assign is set: search for a low penalty irq
> */
>- newirq = dev->irq;
>- if (!newirq && assign) {
>- for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>- if (!(mask & (1 << i)))
>- continue;
>- if (pirq_penalty[i] < pirq_penalty[newirq] &&
>- !request_irq(i, pcibios_test_irq_handler, SA_SHIRQ, "pci-test", dev)) {
>- free_irq(i, dev);
>- newirq = i;
>- }
>- }
>- }
>- DBG(" -> newirq=%d", newirq);
>-
>- /* Check if it is hardcoded */
> if ((pirq & 0xf0) == 0xf0) {
> irq = pirq & 0xf;
> DBG(" -> hardcoded IRQ %d\n", irq);
> msg = "Hardcoded";
>+ } else if (dev->irq) {
>+ irq = dev->irq;
>+ DBG(" -> preselected IRQ %d\n", irq);
>+ msg = "Preselected";
>+ if (!(mask & (1<<irq)))
>+ printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: pirq table doesn't match preselected IRQ for %s, using preselected irq.\n", dev->slot_name);
> } else if (r->get && (irq = r->get(pirq_router_dev, dev, pirq))) {
> DBG(" -> got IRQ %d\n", irq);
> msg = "Found";
>- } else if (newirq && r->set && (dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA) {
>- DBG(" -> assigning IRQ %d", newirq);
>- if (r->set(pirq_router_dev, dev, pirq, newirq)) {
>- eisa_set_level_irq(newirq);
>- DBG(" ... OK\n");
>- msg = "Assigned";
>- irq = newirq;
>+ if (!(mask & (1<<irq)))
>+ printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: pirq table doesn't match IRQ router setting for %s, using irq router setting.\n", dev->slot_name);
>+ } else if (assign) {
>+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>+ if (!(mask & (1 << i)))
>+ continue;
>+ if (pirq_penalty[i] < pirq_penalty[irq] &&
>+ !request_irq(i, pcibios_test_irq_handler, SA_SHIRQ, "pci-test", dev)) {
>+ free_irq(i, dev);
>+ irq = i;
>+ }
> }
>- }
>+ DBG(" -> assigning irq=%d\n", irq);
>+ msg = "Assigned";
>+ } else
>+ return 0;
>+ if (!irq)
>+ return 0;
>
>- if (!irq) {
>- DBG(" ... failed\n");
>- if (newirq && mask == (1 << newirq)) {
>- msg = "Guessed";
>- irq = newirq;
>- } else
>- return 0;
>+ if ((pirq & 0xf0) != 0xf0 && r->set && (dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA) {
>+ /* always rewrite our idea of the interrupt routing back into
>+ * the irq router
>+ */
>+ if (r->set(pirq_router_dev, dev, pirq, irq)) {
>+ DBG("Set succeeded\n");
>+ eisa_set_level_irq(irq);
>+ } else {
>+ DBG("Set failed\n");
>+ /* We ignore this error unless there is no way
>+ * the irq routing could work without a successful
>+ * r->set().
>+ */
>+ if (!strcmp(msg, "Assigned") && mask != (1<<irq)) {
>+ return 0;
>+ }
>+ }
> }
> printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s IRQ %d for device %s\n", msg, irq, dev->slot_name);
>
>@@ -625,11 +653,13 @@
> if (!info)
> continue;
> if (info->irq[pin].link == pirq) {
>- /* We refuse to override the dev->irq information. Give a warning! */
>+ /* Give a warning if we have to overwrite dev->irq information.
>+ * This only happens when multiple devices share one pirq, and
>+ * the bios claims that it routes them to different irq numbers.
>+ */
> if (dev2->irq && dev2->irq != irq) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "IRQ routing conflict for %s, have irq %d, want irq %d\n",
> dev2->slot_name, dev2->irq, irq);
>- continue;
> }
> dev2->irq = irq;
> pirq_penalty[irq]++;
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST