aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional?

From: Matt (matt@bodgit-n-scarper.com)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 10:07:17 EST

Next message: Sinisa Milivojevic: "2.4.16 and gcc 3.0.2"
Previous message: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH] eepro100 - need testers"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I've been trying to set up an HP NetRaid 4M controller, (aacraid), and I got
the familiar fsck hang with both the latest drivers provided by Matt Domsch,
and Alan Cox, under kernel 2.4.16.

I've just tried the latest 2.4.17-pre8 kernel, and it works, in that
it gets passed the fsck'ing. I couldn't see anything in the changelog that
screamed "Fix fsck hang with aacraid", so I was wondering if my working
setup is intentional or not? I haven't followed the development of this
driver too closely, I just had the card and downloaded the latest "stable"
release and went from there...

Searching the archives, I couldn't see anyone reporting a success with this
kernel and card combination, which worried me slightly. Have I got something
that will fall over if I sneeze near it? :-)

Cheers

Matt

-- 
"Phase plasma rifle in a forty-watt range?"
"Only what you see on the shelves, buddy"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sinisa Milivojevic: "2.4.16 and gcc 3.0.2"
Previous message: Zwane Mwaikambo: "[PATCH] eepro100 - need testers"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: aacraid success with 2.4.17-pre8. Intentional?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST