> I'd like to suggest again having patches include change logs. The basic
> idea is for a patch to contain a file like patch.foo in the top-level that
> includes the changelog entry and the maintainer runs a release script that
personally I think Marcelo is doing the right thing, which is actually
applying the needed patches rather than trying to do half of ISO9001
to keep a few people happy.
> them. This would make it much easier for people to know the details of
> what got fixed without further burdening The Maintainer.
<arrogant mode>
If you are qualified to hack on the affected code you are able
to understand the one liner change summary
</arrogant mode>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST