RE: 2.4.16 memory badness (fixed?)

From: M. Edward Borasky (znmeb@aracnet.com)
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:29:05 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> I just can't understand why the kernel wouldn't tag application memory
> as being more important than buff/cache and free up some of that stuff
> when an application calls for it. I mean, it won't even use the gobs of
> swap I have. That just seems to be a plain ol' bug to me.

It's not strictly a bug ... it's a design decision that has unfortunate
consequences. A simple fix would be to allow the system administrator to set
an upper limit on the size of the page cache.

--
M. Edward Borasky
znmeb@@borasky-research.net
http://www.borasky-research.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST