Hi!
> Look at this "top" snapshot:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2:30pm up 3:46, 10 users, load average: 2.96, 1.50, 0.84
> 49 processes: 44 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 1 stopped
> CPU states: 0.1% user, 119.4% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle
> Mem: 63208K av, 62004K used, 1204K free, 24556K shrd, 34892K buff
> Swap: 34236K av, 140K used, 34096K free 7056K cached
>
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> 1632 brain 20 0 1724 1724 992 R 0 33.4 2.7 1:19 mc
> 1654 brain 20 0 784 784 576 R 0 32.2 1.2 0:49 mpg123
> 1652 root 14 0 500 500 368 R 0 21.4 0.7 0:40 top
> 84 root 0 0 244 224 192 S 0 15.7 0.3 0:03 gpm
> 1655 root 20 0 624 624 476 R 0 10.6 0.9 0:02 vi
> 3 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 5.0 0.0 0:18 kupdate
> 121 root 2 0 844 844 588 S 0 0.6 1.3 0:00 bash
> 4 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.2 0.0 0:08 kswapd
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> That's not a joke, it WAS on my machine on very busy network. I've got 2.2.19
> kernel and single AMD K6-2/400. I don't have any turbocharger, so I suppose my
> CPU is able to perform mere 100% of the load. Can you explain it?
Yes. Reading /proc is not atomic. Therefore you can't expect values to
sum to 100%.
But I wonder... Why is it all in *system*?
Pavel
--
"I do not steal MS software. It is not worth it."
-- Pavel Kankovsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST