Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Sun Dec 09 2001 - 17:15:22 EST


Followup to: <20011209141408.A17671@zero>
By author: Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> according to the putc man page in debian stable, it takes the same args as
> fputc. maybe it varies by glibc version (mine is 2.1.3-19). i guess anyone
> using putc better use autoconf. also, "unix system programming for SVr4"
> says the only difference is that putc is an inlined macro version of fputc.
>

Nevermind. I was thinking about putc() and putchar(), additionally
confused by the annoying fact that fputs() is to putc() as puts() is
to putchar()... makes no fscking sense.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:15 EST