Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 17:14:43 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> I have no recorded case of an ext3 crash that someone showed was even
> likely to have been disk caching stuff.

So the case I mentioned to you about 2 months ago was some 'quirk'
of the drive rather than its write cache ? (Yup, 20gb IBM).
I'm sure you mentioned write cache in relation to that, but I could
be wrong.

regards,

Dave.

-- | Dave Jones. http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST