"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <mailgate@hometree.net> said:
> Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> writes:
>
> >Anyhow, the two-fold stable/devel system has been in effect since at
> >least 1.0, when we had 1.1->1.2 (then 1.3->2.0, 2.1->2.2, etc.)
> >Hopefully we can continue this tradition and have 2.5 start sometime!
>
> Personally, I'd consider 2.4 -> 2.9 -> 3.0
What are the earthshattering changes you foresee that would suggest going
for 3.0?
-- Dr. Horst H. von Brand Usuario #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST