mount D-states on secound mount

From: andersg@0x63.nu
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 06:00:07 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Previous message: Samium Gromoff: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

i run 2.4.10 with lvm-1.0.1-rc2 on a smp-system.

Mounting a filesystem a second time fails. (mount /dev/vg00/lv01 /ftp/www ;
mount /dev/vg00/lv01 /www ). The disk contains a reiserfs filesystem.
It worked in 2.4.9 with lvm-1.0.1-rc2. Is this a lvm problem?

Mount D-states here:

Trace; c02085bc <rwsem_down_read_failed+11c/144>
Trace; c020c5b2 <stext_lock+2296/7054>
Trace; c0147d04 <sync_inodes+14/4c>
Trace; c0134a8a <fsync_dev+3a/74>
Trace; c0134ace <sync_dev+a/10>
Trace; c01c5692 <lvm_blk_close+36/54>
Trace; c013b952 <blkdev_put+12e/188>
Trace; c01392fe <get_sb_bdev+1a2/300>
Trace; c0139df0 <do_kern_mount+e8/1b0>
Trace; c0139ef0 <do_add_mount+20/bc>
Trace; c013a17a <do_mount+14e/168>
Trace; c0139fdc <copy_mount_options+50/a0>
Trace; c013a242 <sys_mount+ae/10c>
Trace; c0106d7a <system_call+32/38>

//anders/g

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Previous message: Samium Gromoff: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: mount D-states on secound mount"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:26 EST