> Supermount sounds to me like a very important part of linux, at least for us
> who like our cds/dvds/etc. to work as easily as in fx. windows. For linux to
> be popular among "normal" users, it should be present at every system with
> local removable drives. So, my question is; why isn't supermount a standard
> part of the kernel, or at least a module ?
Because it wants rewriting as a clean file system using the 2.4 dcache and
layering itself above the real fs. In theory the infrastructure for this is
all there.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST