Re: [CHECKER] 8 more potential locking problems

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 18:01:41 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount ?"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
In reply to: Andy Chou: "[CHECKER] 8 more potential locking problems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> We modified our compiler extension for checking lock consistency and
> found 8 more potential errors.

All 8 are real, all 8 fixed in my tree.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount ?"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
In reply to: Andy Chou: "[CHECKER] 8 more potential locking problems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST