Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

From: Justin T. Gibbs (gibbs@scsiguy.com)
Date: Mon Feb 19 2001 - 16:58:43 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: The lack of specification (was Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation... )"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation..."
In reply to: Peter Samuelson: "Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans"
Next in thread: Nathan Black: "RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>BTW, is there really enough common ground between the whole series of
>AIC chips to justify a single huge driver? I know they ship three
>separate NT drivers to cover this range..

The chips are very similar. I think the single driver for Linux is
actually a smaller binary than any of the individual drivers for NT. 8-)

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: The lack of specification (was Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation... )"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation..."
In reply to: Peter Samuelson: "Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans"
Next in thread: Nathan Black: "RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST