On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Roger Gammans wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:34:12PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > > There are far too many *protocols* (http, ftp,
> > > nfsv3, etc.) that also don't know about streams.
> >
> > So they transfer the data in the default streams and
> > work the same way they do now. Apache could still use
>
> Just to point out the obvious. But are you propose that people
> can't use tar for backups without losing their other streams...
Currently you lose your "normal" file attributes (ie. the
ownership info and permission bits) when you transfer a
file over http.
Why would this be any different with extended attributes?
When you _do_ want to have these things transferred, you can
use a modified tar (or cpio or pax) archive format. Just like
the "standard tar" stores the normal unix attributes, it should
store the extended attributes.
And when we're talking about a "multistream file", just give the
user the whole directory in one .tar file...
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST