Re: APIC error interrupt

• Next message: Peter E. Berger: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
• Previous message: G. Hugh Song: "Re: 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console"
• In reply to: Jonatan Kronqvist: "APIC error interrupt"
• Next in thread: Nils Faerber: "Re: APIC error interrupt"
• Reply: Nils Faerber: "Re: APIC error interrupt"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006261828010.21702-100000@anakin.multi.fi>
By author: Jonatan Kronqvist <zycho@multi.fi>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I have only noticed them while running XF86 4.0, _BUT_ I'm not totally
> sure about that.
>
> The system does remain stable tho...
>
> Everything works fine with 2.2-series..
>

I get the same messages, and lockups after -- usually -- a few days of
operation.

Again, 2.2 is rock-solid.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Peter E. Berger: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
• Previous message: G. Hugh Song: "Re: 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console"
• In reply to: Jonatan Kronqvist: "APIC error interrupt"
• Next in thread: Nils Faerber: "Re: APIC error interrupt"
• Reply: Nils Faerber: "Re: APIC error interrupt"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:09 EST