Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code

From: Hans Reiser (hans@reiser.to)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 12:41:37 EST


"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:

> At issue is the timetable for integrating such significant VM interactions
> into the main kernel. The 2.4 is in codefreeze. There's no preferring
> ext3 over reiserfs involved: this is a significant new VM effect we're
> talking about, whichever filesystem is to use it (and hopefully all
> concerned filesystems can use the same hooks, as we've talked with some
> of the XFS people too about this.)

There is no need to delay reiserfs integration into 2.4 to accomplish a
journaling API in 2.5.
>
> Cheers,
> Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:26 EST