Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 11:26:06 EST


Hi,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 01:52:08AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:

> I would love to work towards defining a set of journaling related VFS operations
> in 2.5, and using them, and rewriting reiserfs in 2.5 to use them where they
> differ from what we have now. I would not like to have that be an excuse for
> our exclusion until that is done. I am a pretty simple guy.

Hans, Chris and I have *already been doing this*. That's one of the
reasons I can't understand your attitude. We have a pretty good idea
now of the underlying VM interactions which a journaling filesystem
introduces, thanks to the fact that the core developers involved have
an extremely good working relationship.

At issue is the timetable for integrating such significant VM interactions
into the main kernel. The 2.4 is in codefreeze. There's no preferring
ext3 over reiserfs involved: this is a significant new VM effect we're
talking about, whichever filesystem is to use it (and hopefully all
concerned filesystems can use the same hooks, as we've talked with some
of the XFS people too about this.)

Cheers,
 Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:25 EST