Re: General "Works For Me" Post.

From: Maciej W. Rozycki (macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 11:21:53 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: General "Works For Me" Post."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > ... APIC ESR1: 00000004
> > ... bit 2: APIC Send Accept Error.
> > ===
> > messages, which I understand are due to poor/marginal motherboard
>
> Send accept error is not the normal one

Hmm, couldn't this happen due to noise during the arbitration phase?
It's not checksummed, obviously. A software error, such as no match of
the destination or an illegal vector would be marked differently.

-- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: General "Works For Me" Post."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:25 EST