Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox

From: Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 08:43:39 EST


On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > But if there's only one train anyway and its wheels are
> > advertised replacable, surely that's OK for now? I would
>
> Actually the first people who asked me about 2.4 merging and file
> system stuff were the NWFS folks. The second were some of the JFFS
> users the third was the Reiserfs people. Im not 100% sure if XFS is
> totally ready and I believe IBM jfs has a way to go. Contrary to Hans
> assumptions I've not had any requests from ext3 people to merge stuff

I stand both corrected and fascinated.

Are there any reasons beyond "playing fair" and potentially
making a merge of new journalling code slightly harder that
none at all of these should be allowed in?

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:25 EST