Re: Initialization order of PCI devices

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 12:59:17 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: OSS/Free /dev/audio full duplex sound format."
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: 8259A initialization with AMD SC520 chip (586)"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

James Sutherland wrote:
> Sending the bootp requests through every card is the remaining choice,
> then?

Doing so seems to violate good-neighbor policy, and also has the
potential of waking up links, including fee-based links, unnecessarily.

Jeff

-- Jeff Garzik | Liberty is always dangerous, but Building 1024 | it is the safest thing we have. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- Harry Emerson Fosdick

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: OSS/Free /dev/audio full duplex sound format."
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: 8259A initialization with AMD SC520 chip (586)"
In reply to: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Reply: James Sutherland: "Re: Initialization order of PCI devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST