Re: [PATCH] small rtc.c fix

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Sat May 20 2000 - 13:13:40 EST

Next message: Craig Kulesa: "Re: VM and classzone"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "PCI MMIO flushing and stuff (was Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt)"
In reply to: Cesar Eduardo Barros: "Re: [PATCH] small rtc.c fix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 04:34:37PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Also, make sure you increase the RTC when you do fixes as well as
> > feature updates...
>
> I think this change is too small to need to put my name on the header again.

If it's a bugfix it warrant a new version number, in the absence of a
maintainer's opinion. I don't care if you put your name in the header
again or not :)

Jeff

-- Jeff Garzik | Liberty is always dangerous, but Building 1024 | it is the safest thing we have. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- Harry Emerson Fosdick

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Craig Kulesa: "Re: VM and classzone"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "PCI MMIO flushing and stuff (was Re: 2.2.15 with eepro100: eth0: Too much work at interrupt)"
In reply to: Cesar Eduardo Barros: "Re: [PATCH] small rtc.c fix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST