Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?

From: Daniel.Egger@suse.de
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 15:11:16 EST

Next message: Thomas Molina: "Re: 2.3.47: elevator nr_segments x should be x+1"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Next in thread: Q: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Reply: Q: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 23 Feb, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> Can you send me an strace of this (you will have to do this as root),
> something like:

> strace -ofile ping -c 1 16.1.0.2

> and send me 'file'

I'm afraid I can't anymore. I just replaced it by a glibc2 one... :)
on every of my systems :(

Servus, Daniel

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thomas Molina: "Re: 2.3.47: elevator nr_segments x should be x+1"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Next in thread: Q: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Reply: Q: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:32 EST