Re: accept() improvements for rt signals

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 18:08:28 EST

Next message: Daniel.Egger@suse.de: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Drive name slips..."
In reply to: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dean Gaudet wrote:
> out of curiosity, has the fast syscall and fast gettimeofday stuff with
> the nifty kernel-supplied code page made it into the kernel/glibc/etc?

If it made it into 2.3.recent I've missed it... What needs to be done
to implement this on the kernel side? When Linus(?) spoke about the
magic kernel page I thought it was a neat trick...

-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | Viva la open source! MandrakeSoft, Inc. |

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel.Egger@suse.de: "Re: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Drive name slips..."
In reply to: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Dan Kegel: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:32 EST