Re: accept() improvements for rt signals

From: Dean Gaudet (dgaudet-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 14:19:00 EST


> [lots of syscall combining proposals snipped]

where's ingo? shouldn't he be jumping in here telling us syscall overhead
is some impressively tiny number of cycles which is bare noise above the
L1/L2 cache sloshing we'll see at scale? :) after all, we're talking
about servers with 4k+ sockets, and alan cox tells us to budget about 23kb
of memory per socket -- that's almost 100Mb of RAM... makes me wonder if
combining syscalls is worth the complexity.

out of curiosity, has the fast syscall and fast gettimeofday stuff with
the nifty kernel-supplied code page made it into the kernel/glibc/etc?

Dean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST