Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)

From: almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch
Date: Mon Feb 21 2000 - 08:19:07 EST

Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "2.3.47 Complile error in PCI code [patch]"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: PPP is not SMP safe in 2.2.X (fix)"
In reply to: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Next in thread: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Reply: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sergey Kubushin wrote:
> BTW, why /dev/disCs, not /dev/disKs ? :))

Seagate naming ? As opposed to IBM, Maxtor, Quantum, Toshiba, Fujitsu,
Hitachi, Samsung, NEC ("disk" or "disk drive"), and Western Digital
(just "drive").

- Werner

-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH werner.almesberger@ica.epfl.ch / /_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "2.3.47 Complile error in PCI code [patch]"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: PPP is not SMP safe in 2.2.X (fix)"
In reply to: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Next in thread: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Reply: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:27 EST