Re: low priority soft RT?

Steve Dodd (dirk@loth.demon.co.uk)
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:32:07 +0100


On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 06:00:11AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> > I completely agree on this one. We should probably mark a process
> > with "bonus" if another process tries to grab a lock that's held
> > by the first process.
>
> "Priority inheritance."

Priority inversion?

Or is that something different?

-- 
UNIX - saving you from the Gates of hell

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/