Re: FS corruption... some help maybe??

Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 11:45:23 +0400 (MSD)


In <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907211305160.29336-100000@crafty.cis.uab.edu> Robert M. Hyatt (hyatt@cis.uab.edu) wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Riley Williams wrote:

>> >> When you leave these rare and necessary occasions away, what is
>> >> left?
>>
>> >> Exact the situations, where NT falls over it's own bootstraps.
>>
>> > This is the problem. Win95/Win98/WinNT has to be rebooted a
>> > dozen times just to install a new software package or piece of
>> > hardware. And everyone gets used to the idea that changing
>> > anything (dial-up networking, etc) means a "you must now reboot
>> > windows for your changes to take effect."
>>
>> I remember seeing the following message somewhere, but can't think
>> where...
>>
>> Q> Windows has detected that your mouse has moved. To implement
>> Q> this change, it is necessary to reboot.
>>
>> Somebody PLEASE tell me that Windows isn't really THAT bad !!!
>>

> I think that is a slight exaggeration. However, if you "click" one
> of the buttons, that is a different matter. :)

No. It's NOT exagerration, unfortunatelly. I seen quite a few times when just
mouse move was enough to bring down MS WinWord and then MS Windows. MS WinWord
is not a big problem (Ok, it WAS A PROBLEM to me, of course, but it's not an OS
problem :-) but when the whole MS Windows was killed but mouse move I was pretty
upset...

P.S. Of course sometimes (most of time in fact :-) you are lucky and do not need
reboot to accomodate mouse move and/or mouse click but sometimes... Yes, Windows
really THAT bad :-/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/