Re: Do not use stock RedHat 6.0 kernels with SMBFS!

Michael H. Warfield (mhw@wittsend.com)
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 16:35:38 -0400 (EDT)


Alan,

Alan Cox enscribed thusly:
> > This problem may also have been present with the SMBFS module
> > and smbmount program from the 2.0 kernels. Since I do not maintain
> > that version of smbmount, I'm unaware if the problem existed in those
> > earlier versions or not.

> As far as I am aware Red Hat, and most of the other vendors ship with the
> win95 work around enabled as that (at least was) the normal platform, and
> crashing win95 boxes would give Linux a bad name, even if it wasnt Linux
> fault.

> The real big problem is that the WIN95 workaround isnt a mount option. Or
> better yet autodetected.

One other point about this... While there is a mount option (ugly),
the mount option is totally inoperative when the compile option is enabled
(yes, I had a slight typo in my previous message where I said enabled
twice). Even IF I put the code into smbmount to autodetect the Windows 95
connections (which I want to do), the user space program can not override
that compile option if it's enabled. If the compile option is disabled, I
can set or clear that "feature" on a mount-by-mount, connection-by-connection,
basis. As long as that option is enabled in the build, I'm screwed. I
can't do anything from user space to correct the problem.

> Alan

Mike

-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/