Re: subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h>

Philip Blundell (pb@nexus.co.uk)
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 13:05:41 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Philip Blundell: "Re: GNU/Linux"
Previous message: Zhang Lei: "Re: NFS Performance"
Maybe in reply to: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer: "subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h>"

>While extending our UPX executable packer to support Linux/i386
>executables I've stumbled over what I think is a subtle bug in
>the `asm volatile' statements.

What do you think the problem is? As far as I can tell your patch should have
no effect. You've just expressed the same thing slightly differently.

Can you provide a test case and an example of it going wrong?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Philip Blundell: "Re: GNU/Linux"
Previous message: Zhang Lei: "Re: NFS Performance"
Maybe in reply to: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer: "subtle bug in <include/asm-i386/unistd.h>"