Re: bind 8.2 will not compile with Linux kernel 2.2.3

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@noris.de)
18 Mar 1999 13:06:59 +0100

doctor@fruitbat.org writes:
> The move to glibc2 is very painful, especially if you have a lot of
> apps you've built yourself that you'd have to re-build as a result. So,
> don't go thinking glibc is the greatest thing since sliced-white-bread,
> because it isn't.
>
You don't have to rebuild _any_ applications if you go from libc5 to glibc.
Why do you think you need to do that??

The move from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1 is a bit more painful, unfortunately,
but that wasn't the question.

NB, of _course_ glibc is the best thing since sliced bread.
Just ask anybody who helped to actually write the thing. ;-)

-- 
Matthias Urlichs  |  noris network GmbH   |   smurf@noris.de  |  ICQ: 20193661
The quote was selected randomly. Really.    |      http://www.noris.de/~smurf/

-- 
The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is its inefficiency.
                -- Eugene McCarthy


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/