Re: Possibly bug in Linux Kernel 2.2.1/Signal handling

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 20:52:31 -0500


In message <36EEE92E.45ACCBCE@csi.com>, Olivier Fourdan writes:
+-----
| Linux Kernel 2.2.1 on x86 platform handles SIGPIPE signal in a strange way, at
| least different from Linux Kernel 2.0.xx, Solaris or FreeBSD. It does not emit
| the SIGPIPE signal when the pipe dies, but rather when an application tries to
| write data in it !
+--->8

I'd be rather surprised if the others didn't behave that way, since that's
how it's *supposed* to work. SIGPIPE == write on pipe with no reader.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	[os/2][linux][solaris][japh]	 allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	     [WAY too many hats]	   allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering			 KF8NH
     We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/