Re: Interrupts not being raised.

Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Sun, 14 Feb 1999 08:48:57 +0100 (MET)


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Adding an 'enable_irq(irq)' after registering the IRQ provokes the
> > kernel into saying "enable_irq() unbalanced from 00000009", but doesn't
^^^^^^^^^
> > actually make it work.
>
> a registered IRQ is automatically enabled.

The underlined address sounds as if you compiled your kenrel using
"-f omit-frame-pointer". There is a gcc bug in builtin_return_address
when that option is enabled.

Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
*   Never blow in a cat's ear because if you do, usually after three or  *
*   four times, they will bite your lips!  And they don't let go for at  *
*   least a minute. -- Lisa Coburn, age 9

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/