Re: fsync on large files

Francois Desarmenien (desar@club-internet.fr)
Sat, 13 Feb 1999 10:51:35 +0000


Rotate log *dayly* (or more often if it grows so fast) instead of *weekly* !

François Désarménien

Alan Curry wrote:

> I'm coming late to this topic, but with a good reason: I just figured out
> today that syslogd's fsyncs have been the cause of some major performance
> problems on an ISP's central server. Load averages have been unreasonably
> high and gradually getting worse. Today we realized that there is a weekly
> cycle to it, and it matches the cycle of the log rotation of
> /var/log/messages. As this log file grows (currently 36 megs with 2 days left
> before rotation) and beyond, with syslogd fsync'ing every line it writes,
> syslogd hangs for long periods of time, and when syslogd is hung, lots of
> other stuff hangs.
>
> Previously I deleted all the messages on the large-file-fsync thread without
> paying much attention, and now it seems to have died off just when I realized
> I needed it. What I could find in the archive did not seem to be a conclusive
> answer to what is now a pretty urgent question: would 2.2.1 do better than
> 2.0.36 is doing here? And if I'm 2.2-phobic (which I'm not, but some people
> are), will 2.0.37 fix this problem?
>
> Given that all of the stuff on this machine is pretty close to redhat 5.x
> standard issue, including the syslogd and log rotation configuration, are
> there lots of other people out there suffering without knowing the cause,
> like I was?
>
> --
> Alan Curry
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/