Re: [Patch] IPv4 TCP security impovement

Savochkin Andrey Vladimirovich (saw@msu.ru)
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:36:01 +0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Vier: "Re: linux-kernel's extremely slow turnaround time"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long)"

On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 01:53:53AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
[...]
> The patch is not suitable for kernel inclusion IMHO.

I agree. ACK+RST replies were invented for good reasons.

If somebody wants to hide which ports are open
he should better configure a firewall.

Regards
Andrey V.
Savochkin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Vier: "Re: linux-kernel's extremely slow turnaround time"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long)"