Re: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:32:46 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Savochkin Andrey Vladimirovich: "Re: [Patch] IPv4 TCP security impovement"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [Patch] IPv4 TCP security impovement"

> Then why not use v0.89K instead of v0.89H in the kernel? Does the
> K-version contain bugs that the H-version doesn't contain? At least to me,
> K sounds like it is a newer version than H... (...HIJK...)

0.89H matches 2.0.36 its one we have detailed "experimental data" on as it
were. I'm currently collating info on other versions.

> > 0.90 seems to work very well unless you have a VIA chipset.
>
> Of course, the best solution would be to find the reason for this.

Funnily enough people are trying

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Savochkin Andrey Vladimirovich: "Re: [Patch] IPv4 TCP security impovement"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [Patch] IPv4 TCP security impovement"