Re: why umsdos?
Matija Nalis (mnalis@public.srce.hr)
Mon, 9 Nov 98 20:08 MET
On Sun, 8 Nov 1998 18:27:03 +0000 (GMT), Riley Williams <rhw@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> > I think, a general ums-like pseudo-ext2-fs over not only umsdos,
> > but all non unix-compatible fs were very good and useful for the
> > linux community.
>
>I'd certainly like to see a variant of UMSDOS that assumes the
>underlying file system is VFAT rather than MSDOS - in fact, I'm
>tempted to have a go at the UVFAT file system myself...
You may want to contact Michael.Leodolter@univie.ac.at, original autor of
UVFAT patches. UMSDOS is stable now so they could be redone.
--
Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/