Re: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version

Michael Harnois (mharnois@willinet.net)
29 Oct 1998 10:28:00 -600


alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) writes:

> So the egcs folk appear to be going out of their way to be helpful

That's typically been the case. After all, they got started in order
to provide an alternative to an unresponsive development effort. It
appears to me that the only thing they've *not* been willing to do is
break their compiler to accomodate for broken software.

--
Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA 
mharnois@willinet.net                      aa0bt@aa0bt.ampr.org 
Earth has its boundaries, but human stupidity is limitless.
  -- Gustave Flaubert

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/