Re: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version
Philip Blundell (pb@nexus.co.uk)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 11:59:07 +0100
>BTW. Linus and Alan are utterly wrong in theyr bashing of egcs. The single
>one sufficient reason which gratifies the usage of egcs over gcc-2.7.x is:
>Actually *usable* and standard adherent C++ support. (However there are
>some other resons too). Therefore it's really a pitty that one can't use
>the stable 2.0.xx with it...
You don't have to use the same compiler for the kernel and user binaries. If
you want to use EGCS for C++ then go right ahead. It will coexist with gcc
2.7.2 quite happily.
p.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/