status of KU's utime patches ?

Paul Barton-Davis (pbd@Op.Net)
Sun, 20 Sep 1998 00:54:27 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: 2.1.120 - too many errors on the network interfaces"
Previous message: RHS Linux User: "intel_vs_better"

whats the official line on the KU UTIME patches, which provided
microsecond timer resolution on a strictly as-needed basis, at the
expense, apparently, of screwing with the "new" fast timer code ? was
there anyone sufficiently motivated to get it working that it now does?
was the idea even well received by linus ?

--pbd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: 2.1.120 - too many errors on the network interfaces"
Previous message: RHS Linux User: "intel_vs_better"